My response re quality content
Cara asks me to take a stab at defining qualiy content. I thought my blogs contained quality content, as a matter of fact.
However, here is what I think it means:
Good content is the same topic as the title. When people click through they get what they thought they would get.
Good content is original and not copied or plagairized.
Good content provides valuable information. Not necessarily brand new information because there is nothng new under the sun, as the saying goes, but valuable information pertaining to the topic. Can you guarantee its new to the reader? No. You have no idea what the reader already knows about the topic.
Good content is well written without glariing grammatical and spelling errors.
Good content is accurate, to the best of your knowledge.
Good content is not a thinly veiled sales page, nor is it full of hype.
I've run out of thoughts. Would anyone else care to add to this?
|